Programme record · UST Global
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
too few to report
n=14 D2 · need ≥20
Cohorts attended
2
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C18 | San Francisco | June 22–23, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +100 | +35 | +65 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C19 | San Francisco | June 24–25, 2026 | 13 | 13 | +38 | +55 | -17 | P 46%/Pa 46%/D 8% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 29%Architect 71%
AI proficiency
Learning 7%Applying 50%Independent 21%Frontier 21%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 25%Mgr 75%
Content depth
About right 100%
Pace
Too slow 7%Well paced 79%Too fast 14%
Relevance (mean)
4.1 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
3.8 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
n=14 · too few
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
n=13 · too few
Design Δ
n=13 · too few
Commercial Δ
n=13 · too few
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Developer | — | — | — | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Developer | 1 | 3 | — | — |
Satisfaction by Persona
Architect
n=10 · too few