Programme record · Reply
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
too few to report
n=8 D2 · need ≥20
Cohorts attended
2
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C6 | London | May 18–19, 2026 | 8 | 6 | +50 | +43 | +7 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C22 | London | July 20–21, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +0 | +41 | -41 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 70%T.Lead 30%
AI proficiency
Applying 80%Independent 20%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 43%Mgr 57%
Content depth
Too basic 30%About right 70%
Pace
Well paced 80%Too fast 20%
Relevance (mean)
4.1 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
3.8 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
n=8 · too few
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
n=2 · too few
Design Δ
n=2 · too few
Commercial Δ
n=2 · too few
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer | — | 3 | 1 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | — | 3 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Developer | — | 6 | 1 | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | 2 | 1 | — |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=5 · too few