Programme record · NEC
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+55
60% promoters 5% detractors
n=58 D2
vs Programme
+12
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
10
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C15 | San Francisco | June 16-17 | 3 | 2 | +100 | +55 | +45 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C19 | San Francisco | June 24–25, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +100 | +55 | +45 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C20 | San Francisco | July 14–15, 2026 | 3 | 3 | +67 | +35 | +32 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C21 | San Francisco | July 16–17, 2026 | 6 | 6 | +50 | +24 | +26 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C24 | San Francisco | July 27–28, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +0 | +45 | -45 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C29 | San Francisco | August 24–25, 2026 | 5 | 5 | +40 | +48 | -8 | P 40%/Pa 60%/D 0% |
| C30 | San Francisco | August 27–28, 2026 | 3 | 3 | -67 | +31 | -98 | P 0%/Pa 33%/D 67% |
| C31 | San Francisco | September 9–10, 2026 | 17 | 15 | +67 | +36 | +31 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 19 | 17 | +65 | +56 | +9 | P 71%/Pa 24%/D 6% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 5 | 5 | +60 | +40 | +20 | P 60%/Pa 40%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 59%Architect 22%T.Lead 19%
AI proficiency
Learning 30%Applying 51%Independent 10%Frontier 10%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 66%Mgr 34%
Content depth
Too basic 6%About right 79%Too advanced 14%
Pace
Too slow 2%Well paced 65%Too fast 33%
Relevance (mean)
4.2 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
3.5 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.21
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.21
Design Δ
+0.21
Commercial Δ
+0.36
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 5 | 5 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 9 | 4 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | 5 | 1 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 3 | 9 | — | 2 |
| Developer | 10 | 20 | 5 | 2 |
| Transformation Lead | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
+58
Architect
n=12 · too few
Transformation Lead
n=10 · too few
Strategic Insights
Programme fit: Excellent alignment — 4.2/5 relevance with +0.21 confidence growth; 79% rate content depth as optimal
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +55 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 10 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions