Programme record · LTM
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+73
77% promoters 4% detractors
n=26 D2
vs Programme
+30
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
4
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C30 | San Francisco | August 27–28, 2026 | 5 | 5 | +40 | +31 | +9 | P 60%/Pa 20%/D 20% |
| C31 | San Francisco | September 9–10, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +100 | +36 | +64 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 8 | 7 | +86 | +56 | +30 | P 86%/Pa 14%/D 0% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 13 | 13 | +77 | +40 | +37 | P 77%/Pa 23%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 26%Architect 48%T.Lead 26%
AI proficiency
Learning 19%Applying 67%Independent 11%Frontier 4%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 75%Mgr 25%
Content depth
About right 93%Too advanced 7%
Pace
Well paced 89%Too fast 11%
Relevance (mean)
4.4 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.4 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.15
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.15
Design Δ
+0.12
Commercial Δ
+0.00
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Developer | — | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | — | — | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 1 | 9 | 2 | 1 |
| Developer | 1 | 6 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | 3 | 3 | 1 | — |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=6 · too few
Architect
n=13 · too few
Transformation Lead
n=7 · too few
Strategic Insights
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +73 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 4 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions