Programme record · DXC Technology
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+52
53% promoters 2% detractors
n=62 D2
vs Programme
+9
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
10
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C20 | San Francisco | July 14–15, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +50 | +35 | +15 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C21 | San Francisco | July 16–17, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +0 | +24 | -24 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C22 | London | July 20–21, 2026 | 7 | 2 | +50 | +41 | +9 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C23 | London | July 22–23, 2026 | 8 | 4 | +0 | +47 | -47 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C24 | San Francisco | July 27–28, 2026 | 15 | 13 | +69 | +45 | +24 | P 69%/Pa 31%/D 0% |
| C25 | San Francisco | July 29–30, 2026 | 11 | 10 | +70 | +44 | +26 | P 70%/Pa 30%/D 0% |
| C27 | London | July 29–30, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +25 | +43 | -18 | P 25%/Pa 75%/D 0% |
| C29 | San Francisco | August 24–25, 2026 | 19 | 17 | +71 | +48 | +23 | P 71%/Pa 29%/D 0% |
| C30 | San Francisco | August 27–28, 2026 | 3 | 2 | +50 | +31 | +19 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C31 | San Francisco | September 9–10, 2026 | 5 | 5 | -20 | +36 | -56 | P 0%/Pa 80%/D 20% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 27%Architect 23%T.Lead 49%
AI proficiency
Learning 34%Applying 40%Independent 12%Frontier 14%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 42%Mgr 58%
Content depth
Too basic 5%About right 88%Too advanced 6%
Pace
Well paced 74%Too fast 26%
Relevance (mean)
4.2 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
3.8 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.26
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.26
Design Δ
+0.16
Commercial Δ
+0.27
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 8 | 7 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 11 | 4 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | — | 15 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
| Developer | 4 | 12 | 1 | 4 |
| Transformation Lead | 17 | 13 | 2 | 6 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=19 · too few
Architect
n=15 · too few
Transformation Lead
+39
Strategic Insights
Programme fit: Excellent alignment — 4.2/5 relevance with +0.26 confidence growth; 88% rate content depth as optimal
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +52 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 10 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions