Programme record · Cognizant
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+53
61% promoters 8% detractors
n=36 D2
vs Programme
+10
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
9
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C7 | San Francisco | May 19-20, 2026 | 9 | 7 | -14 | +32 | -46 | P 29%/Pa 29%/D 43% |
| C15 | San Francisco | June 16-17 | 5 | 1 | +0 | +55 | -55 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C18 | San Francisco | June 22–23, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +50 | +35 | +15 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C19 | San Francisco | June 24–25, 2026 | 9 | 9 | +89 | +55 | +34 | P 89%/Pa 11%/D 0% |
| C25 | San Francisco | July 29–30, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +75 | +44 | +31 | P 75%/Pa 25%/D 0% |
| C29 | San Francisco | August 24–25, 2026 | 6 | 6 | +67 | +48 | +19 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C30 | San Francisco | August 27–28, 2026 | 5 | 3 | +67 | +31 | +36 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 3 | 2 | +50 | +56 | -6 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 24%Architect 26%T.Lead 50%
AI proficiency
Learning 30%Applying 43%Independent 11%Frontier 15%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 11%Mgr 89%
Content depth
Too basic 11%About right 78%Too advanced 11%
Pace
Too slow 4%Well paced 91%Too fast 4%
Relevance (mean)
3.8 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.1 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.39
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.39
Design Δ
+0.39
Commercial Δ
+0.36
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | — | 5 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 2 | 6 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | — | 6 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Developer | 5 | 4 | — | 2 |
| Transformation Lead | 5 | 13 | 2 | 3 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=8 · too few
Architect
n=10 · too few
Transformation Lead
n=18 · too few
Strategic Insights
Programme fit: Excellent alignment — 3.8/5 relevance with +0.39 confidence growth; 78% rate content depth as optimal
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +53 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 9 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions