Programme record · Cognizant
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+29
50% promoters 21% detractors
n=28 D2
vs Programme
-13
programme avg +42
Cohorts attended
5
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C7 | San Francisco | May 19-20, 2026 | 9 | 7 | -14 | +32 | -46 | P 29%/Pa 29%/D 43% |
| C7 | San Francisco | May 19-20, 2026 | 9 | 7 | -14 | +32 | -46 | P 29%/Pa 29%/D 43% |
| C15 | San Francisco | June 16-17 | 5 | 1 | +0 | +55 | -55 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C18 | San Francisco | June 22–23, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +50 | +35 | +15 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C19 | San Francisco | June 24–25, 2026 | 9 | 9 | +89 | +55 | +34 | P 89%/Pa 11%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 22%Architect 31%T.Lead 47%
AI proficiency
Learning 31%Applying 39%Independent 19%Frontier 11%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 11%Mgr 89%
Content depth
Too basic 15%About right 81%Too advanced 4%
Pace
Too slow 7%Well paced 89%Too fast 4%
Relevance (mean)
3.9 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.0 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.48
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
n=9 · too few
Design Δ
n=9 · too few
Commercial Δ
n=9 · too few
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | — | 4 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | — | 5 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Developer | 5 | 2 | — | 1 |
| Transformation Lead | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=4 · too few
Transformation Lead
n=4 · too few
Strategic Insights
Programme fit: Excellent alignment — 3.9/5 relevance with +0.48 confidence growth; 81% rate content depth as optimal