Programme record · Capgemini
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+59
62% promoters 3% detractors
n=34 D2
vs Programme
+16
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
9
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C6 | London | May 18–19, 2026 | 5 | 3 | +100 | +43 | +57 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C9 | London | May 20-21, 2026 | 2 | 1 | +0 | +38 | -38 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C14 | London | June 4-5, 2026 | 2 | 1 | +100 | +39 | +61 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C16 | London | June 15-16, 2026 | 4 | 1 | -100 | +17 | -117 | P 0%/Pa 0%/D 100% |
| C22 | London | July 20–21, 2026 | 13 | 7 | +57 | +41 | +16 | P 57%/Pa 43%/D 0% |
| C23 | London | July 22–23, 2026 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | |
| C27 | London | July 29–30, 2026 | 27 | 20 | +65 | +43 | +22 | P 65%/Pa 35%/D 0% |
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +0 | +56 | -56 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 24%Architect 38%T.Lead 38%
AI proficiency
Learning 33%Applying 41%Independent 16%Frontier 10%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 40%Mgr 60%
Content depth
Too basic 5%About right 78%Too advanced 17%
Pace
Too slow 7%Well paced 83%Too fast 10%
Relevance (mean)
4.1 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.1 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.24
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.24
Design Δ
+0.18
Commercial Δ
+0.26
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 3 | 13 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 8 | 1 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | 3 | 7 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 10 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Developer | 3 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
| Transformation Lead | 6 | 10 | 3 | 3 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=10 · too few
Architect
n=14 · too few
Transformation Lead
n=10 · too few
Strategic Insights
Programme fit: Excellent alignment — 4.1/5 relevance with +0.24 confidence growth; 78% rate content depth as optimal
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +59 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 9 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions