Programme record · Ascendion
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+69
69% promoters 0% detractors
n=36 D2
vs Programme
+26
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
14
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C8 | San Francisco | May 21-22, 2026 | 4 | 3 | +67 | +43 | +24 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C15 | San Francisco | June 16-17 | 1 | 0 | — | — | — | |
| C18 | San Francisco | June 22–23, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +100 | +35 | +65 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C19 | San Francisco | June 24–25, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +75 | +55 | +20 | P 75%/Pa 25%/D 0% |
| C20 | San Francisco | July 14–15, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +50 | +35 | +15 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C21 | San Francisco | July 16–17, 2026 | 3 | 3 | +67 | +24 | +43 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C22 | London | July 20–21, 2026 | 2 | 1 | +100 | +41 | +59 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C25 | San Francisco | July 29–30, 2026 | 7 | 4 | +75 | +44 | +31 | P 75%/Pa 25%/D 0% |
| C27 | London | July 29–30, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +0 | +43 | -43 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C29 | San Francisco | August 24–25, 2026 | 5 | 5 | +100 | +48 | +52 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C30 | San Francisco | August 27–28, 2026 | 2 | 1 | +100 | +31 | +69 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C31 | San Francisco | September 9–10, 2026 | 8 | 6 | +67 | +36 | +31 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +50 | +56 | -6 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 5 | 3 | +33 | +40 | -7 | P 33%/Pa 67%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 45%Architect 28%T.Lead 28%
AI proficiency
Learning 26%Applying 45%Independent 21%Frontier 9%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 35%Mgr 65%
Content depth
Too basic 4%About right 87%Too advanced 9%
Pace
Too slow 2%Well paced 87%Too fast 11%
Relevance (mean)
4.3 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.1 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.17
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.17
Design Δ
+0.00
Commercial Δ
+0.14
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 2 | 7 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | 1 | 2 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Developer | 4 | 11 | 5 | 1 |
| Transformation Lead | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=16 · too few
Architect
n=10 · too few
Transformation Lead
n=10 · too few
Strategic Insights
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +70 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 14 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions