Programme record · Altimetrik
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
too few to report
n=6 D2 · need ≥20
Cohorts attended
2
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +100 | +56 | +44 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 7 | 4 | +50 | +40 | +10 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 44%Architect 56%
AI proficiency
Applying 56%Independent 33%Frontier 11%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 83%Mgr 17%
Content depth
Too basic 11%About right 78%Too advanced 11%
Pace
Well paced 89%Too fast 11%
Relevance (mean)
4.6 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.6 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
n=6 · too few
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
n=6 · too few
Design Δ
n=6 · too few
Commercial Δ
n=6 · too few
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 3 | — | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 2 | 3 | — |
| Developer | — | 3 | — | 1 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
n=2 · too few
Architect
n=4 · too few