Programme record · Accenture
Quantitative data from post-programme surveys. NPS, participation, and benchmark against programme average across all cohorts attended.
Pooled NPS
+73
73% promoters 0% detractors
n=63 D2
vs Programme
+30
programme avg +43
Cohorts attended
14
| Cohort | City | Dates | D1 n | D2 n | NPS | Prog avg | Gap | P/Pa/D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C6 | London | May 18–19, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +100 | +43 | +57 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C7 | San Francisco | May 19-20, 2026 | 17 | 11 | +73 | +32 | +41 | P 73%/Pa 27%/D 0% |
| C9 | London | May 20-21, 2026 | 25 | 6 | +67 | +38 | +29 | P 67%/Pa 33%/D 0% |
| C11 | San Francisco | May 26-27, 2026 | 15 | 12 | +75 | +73 | +2 | P 75%/Pa 25%/D 0% |
| C22 | London | July 20–21, 2026 | 4 | 2 | +100 | +41 | +59 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C23 | London | July 22–23, 2026 | 2 | 1 | +100 | +47 | +53 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C24 | San Francisco | July 27–28, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +100 | +45 | +55 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C25 | San Francisco | July 29–30, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +100 | +44 | +56 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C27 | London | July 29–30, 2026 | 4 | 4 | +50 | +43 | +7 | P 50%/Pa 50%/D 0% |
| C29 | San Francisco | August 24–25, 2026 | 13 | 13 | +85 | +48 | +37 | P 85%/Pa 15%/D 0% |
| C30 | San Francisco | August 27–28, 2026 | 3 | 3 | +0 | +31 | -31 | P 0%/Pa 100%/D 0% |
| C31 | San Francisco | September 9–10, 2026 | 2 | 2 | +100 | +36 | +64 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
| C32 | San Francisco | September 15–16, 2026 | 3 | 3 | +33 | +56 | -23 | P 33%/Pa 67%/D 0% |
| C33 | San Francisco | September 17–18, 2026 | 1 | 1 | +100 | +40 | +60 | P 100%/Pa 0%/D 0% |
Capability Profile
Persona mix
Developer 30%Architect 29%T.Lead 41%
AI proficiency
Learning 21%Applying 49%Independent 18%Frontier 12%
Seniority mix
Sr Prac 31%Mgr 69%
Content depth
Too basic 7%About right 84%Too advanced 9%
Pace
Too slow 2%Well paced 82%Too fast 16%
Relevance (mean)
4.4 / 5
D1 confidence (mean)
4.3 / 5
Confidence Δ (D1→D2)
+0.25
Confidence growth by domain
Build Δ
+0.25
Design Δ
+0.25
Commercial Δ
+0.24
Persona × Seniority
| Persona | Individual Contributor | Sr Practitioner | Mgr / Sr Mgr | Director | SVP / C-Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | — | 7 | 11 | — | — |
| Developer | — | 10 | 11 | — | — |
| Transformation Lead | — | 3 | 22 | — | — |
Persona × AI Proficiency
| Persona | Learning | Applying | Independent | Frontier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | 4 | 12 | 4 | 7 |
| Developer | 5 | 16 | 6 | 1 |
| Transformation Lead | 11 | 18 | 7 | 3 |
Satisfaction by Persona
Developer
+70
Architect
n=16 · too few
Transformation Lead
+74
Strategic Insights
Programme fit: Excellent alignment — 4.4/5 relevance with +0.25 confidence growth; 84% rate content depth as optimal
Team composition: Well-balanced across Developers, Architects, and Leaders — NPS +73 reflects strong multi-functional engagement
Partner stability: Consistent engagement across 14 cohorts — reliability signal for strategic expansions