Promotersscore 9–10 · 25 responses
1Connections, energy, content are all great10
2Great course learned a lot of new things10
3Awesome exercises and moderation10
4Very helpful sessions and labs10
5To explore Claude and use it in my work10
6Hands On!!!10
7Pretty Interactive.10
8Great content and exercises10
9This was a great way to learn more and get plugged in further to our joint partnership.10
10I liked the interaction for the workshops and hackathon. Also the new framework as well as inference optimization was good10
11Phenomenal hands-on course for adoption and enablement. Well planned out and engaging.10
12Learning and exposure10
13It was fun. A lot of information thrown at you, but in a good way. I felt like I learned a lot and met some cool people :).10
14Being able to obtain a place to exchange opinions with strangers globally, and gaining deeper insight into how to use Claude Code."
If this is meant to flow as one sentence (e.g., as part of a list of takeaways or acknowledgments), a smoother version might be:
"Gaining a venue to exchange ideas with people from around the world I'd never met, and deepening my understanding of how to use Claude Code.10
15Through the seminar, I could fully understood the features of Claude code and how to use claude code in various situations.
In addition, there are many opportunities to communicate internationally.10
16can learn the basics of "current" AI10
17Able to know the logic how to handle llm and prepare the environment to keep the accuracy10
18Pretty chill and well paced9
19Good day today9
20Very hands on and applicable. Access issues can hinder a bit.9
21Perhaps different tracks for different levels of experience.9
22Very informative and immersive. Loved it. Definitely for those more experienced in Claude Code.9
23Practical knowledges. We could apply this even from tomorrow.9
24I noticed how important defining 'eval'.9
25I learned new things about context memory, evals9
Passivesscore 7–8 · 15 responses
1Very interesting session to deep dive o Claude capabilities8
2It was super fun and informative.8
3ケーススタディがとても実際の業務に即した内容であったため。
少なからず日本ではまだまだAIをお客さんにエージェント提案する段階には至ってないため、少し先の未来に直面する課題を取り組めたと感じてます。8
4I loved the hands on approach.8
5It really hit home that I hadn't been fully utilizing Claude's capabilities until now.8
6The day two contents were really good, building graders for evals, inference optimisation7
7Good amount of hands on work. Would have like more time with applied ai folks about what they are seeing and compelling new use cases.7
8Would've been nice to see each exercise through to the end. Not enough time, but getting a set of prompts afterwards with the "answer" would be nice7
9I am very involved with lots of AI/agentic efforts and have foundational knowledge of Claude in general via both work and personal use. There were some interesting things that were new to me that makes me want to explore more.7
10It was very insightful, some activities required more time than allocated for less experienced developers.7
11I found the sessions interesting, informative and challenging. I’m not a developer or programmer so it was still valuable to seeing Claude in action this way.7
12Great experience to see Claude in action while being able to interact with it hands on7
13getting knowledge of how to try ideas easily7
14A lot of it could be done as online training with chat bot support7
15Great experience to see Claude in action while being able to interact with it hands on7
Detractorsscore 0–6 · 11 responses
1Helpful for learning Claude code but more technical that my current work6
2Difficulty with acceas6
3Very technical. I think your general consultant is mainly using AI to assist in analysis and delivery, instead of designing agents.6
4There is high value to the two days but I think splitting the topics and agenda more between functional and technical.6
5I really enjoyed the presenters and wish they would’ve spoken more. For someone at my level, it would’ve been very helpful to see them walk through the exercises instead of doing them by myself. My favorite part was the hackathon and I really enjoyed collaborating with my team. I wish more of the sessions were collaborative, but overall felt like I learned a lot.6
6No “new” information was shared, almost all of this content could be done remotely with a very similar impact. Very good content but i didn’t really feel that i got much benefit from being in person6
7I believe cohorts should be divided by skill and proficiency5
8Felt like a lot of the workbooks were run autonomously without me understanding what the learning was supposed to be4
9It’s not interactive enough. The coding exercises are very monotonous. It should be more interactive and instructor driven.4
10I would have liked more instructions and demoes since some of this was pretty new.4
11This was very dev focused. A lot of things were not explained well and I fell into trying to figure out coding and using VSCode3