Promotersscore 9–10 · 16 responses
1Enjoyed the Basecamp and learned a lot!10
2Interactive and collaborative10
3learned a lot to bring back to pwc, and got more comfortable interacting with claude tools & jupyter notebooks10
4Why not10
5Great information and facilitation10
6Awesome Hands on experience best way to learn10
7Increased learning about effective usage of claude10
8The depth and level at which all hands-on sessions were conducted.10
9Great session10
10Learnt some new ways to use stuff that I use everyday.10
11Explanatory and with a good level of hands on9
12Everything was good9
13its so fun9
14Learned a lot of leading practices on how to build an agent9
15It was great and got me comfortable with using Claude code for the first time9
16It’s a great opportunity to learn about gen ai and Claude capabilities, with non obvious insights on optimisations.9
Passivesscore 7–8 · 19 responses
1Amazing exercise and hands-on8
2There are many components that are bleeding edge that Clients are not ready for8
3Learned a lot of useful information8
4The session was so inspiring and I learned a lot from it.8
5There was a lot to learn8
6It’s well paced and is challenging enough for someone technical but, Claude can walk you through each exercise.8
7I learned a lot from it8
8I think this was very very heavy on Jupyter notebooks which is not relevant to my current role.7
9Hackathon at end7
10Good concepts, would be good for some folks to have more details on the underlying concepts and best practices you are seeing in application. Overall it was good7
11I wish it was even more hands on, and that there is a bit more collaboration with others. The api issues also prevented us from completing stuff7
12Good for ppl with pre-existing technical background but non-technical folks looking to get hands-on ai experience like product folks might feel theres a steep learning curve.7
13The Claude system is responding very slow and had to kill and restart multiple times. Pls have some dedicated env scaled down if needed for training if possible7
14There should have more internal knowledge of Claude7
15It was an interesting session7
16It was useful but I think covered too wide an audience. Some stuff felt boring for engineering or hard for me, a PM7
17Very very useful for the mildly technical but very basic for engineers that do this every day.7
18It was informative , interesting and helped learn and share knowledge7
19It's helpful for people to know the techniques if they are not familiar with Claude but some technical parts are very complex to understand in a short amount of time, in a small screen.7
Detractorsscore 0–6 · 6 responses
1It’s a bit too basic for us6
2Depends on the catalogue. There’sa lot of good stuff here, but it’s pretty basic for most of my coworkers6
3Not differentiated by level of technical skill5
4Super dependant on role and their existing experience in the AI dev space5
5It is a useful training for people starting in the AI applied architect role, but I found it too basic if you already have several years of experience. I was already familiar with most of the topics that were presented4
6I am an engineer and this was not a session for engineers, more like for business/sales people. We also had a lot of issues with the WiFi (which was throttling us) and Claude outages, so most of the Jupyter notebook code they provided did not successfully run :(2